https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265398 The Court refrained from interfering and left the decision to the President of the Appellate Tribunal regarding the assignment of a matter with differences of opinion between members. The Court emphasized the President's authority under Section 35D of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and disposed of the writ petition, allowing the President to reconsider assigning the matter to Shri Ashok Jindal or another member. This case underscores the balance between judicial interference and administrative functions within the Tribunal. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:50:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265398 The Court refrained from interfering and left the decision to the President of the Appellate Tribunal regarding the assignment of a matter with differences of opinion between members. The Court emphasized the President's authority under Section 35D of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and disposed of the writ petition, allowing the President to reconsider assigning the matter to Shri Ashok Jindal or another member. This case underscores the balance between judicial interference and administrative functions within the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265398