<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 670 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265395</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing that no question of law arose in the case as the final order was based on an agreement between the parties. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, upheld on appeal, resulted in the dismissal of the review application, highlighting the significance of agreements in resolving disputes and underscoring the finality of the Tribunal&#039;s order in production determination matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 670 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265395</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing that no question of law arose in the case as the final order was based on an agreement between the parties. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, upheld on appeal, resulted in the dismissal of the review application, highlighting the significance of agreements in resolving disputes and underscoring the finality of the Tribunal&#039;s order in production determination matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>