<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265393</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order for waiver of pre-deposit and stay. The Court directed the Commissioner to reassess the prima facie case and undue hardship considerations within two weeks. The judgment emphasized the need for the Commissioner to demonstrate consideration of these factors before making such decisions. No costs were awarded, and the case was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265393</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order for waiver of pre-deposit and stay. The Court directed the Commissioner to reassess the prima facie case and undue hardship considerations within two weeks. The judgment emphasized the need for the Commissioner to demonstrate consideration of these factors before making such decisions. No costs were awarded, and the case was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>