<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 665 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265390</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution for alleged excise duty evasion may continue even while adjudication proceedings are pending before the appellate tribunal, because the offence under the Central Excise Act is distinct from the scope of adjudication. The court treated the two proceedings as capable of running simultaneously and rejected the plea to quash the prosecution, allowing the criminal case to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 665 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265390</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution for alleged excise duty evasion may continue even while adjudication proceedings are pending before the appellate tribunal, because the offence under the Central Excise Act is distinct from the scope of adjudication. The court treated the two proceedings as capable of running simultaneously and rejected the plea to quash the prosecution, allowing the criminal case to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>