https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265389 Rule 5 of the Hot Rerolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination (Amendment) Rules, 1997 was examined for compatibility with Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. A prior Division Bench decision had already repelled the challenge to Rule 5 and had not held it ultra vires or contrary to Section 3A. As no transfer petition was pending before the Supreme Court, the court found no scope to press the writ appeals and dismissed them by relying on that earlier authoritative ruling. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:49:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265389 Rule 5 of the Hot Rerolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination (Amendment) Rules, 1997 was examined for compatibility with Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. A prior Division Bench decision had already repelled the challenge to Rule 5 and had not held it ultra vires or contrary to Section 3A. As no transfer petition was pending before the Supreme Court, the court found no scope to press the writ appeals and dismissed them by relying on that earlier authoritative ruling. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265389