<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 658 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265383</link>
    <description>Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, having been declared invalid, cannot support imposition of penalty. The invalidity of the provision is determinative irrespective of whether the assessee deposited the entire compounded levy by the end of the relevant month. Accordingly, penalty proceedings founded solely on Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 658 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265383</link>
      <description>Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, having been declared invalid, cannot support imposition of penalty. The invalidity of the provision is determinative irrespective of whether the assessee deposited the entire compounded levy by the end of the relevant month. Accordingly, penalty proceedings founded solely on Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>