<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 652 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265377</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed a Tribunal order for improper authorization under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. An affidavit demonstrated proper authorization by two Commissioners. The appeal is reinstated for reconsideration, with the Tribunal to address the preliminary objection on tax effect. The appeal is concluded without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 652 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265377</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed a Tribunal order for improper authorization under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. An affidavit demonstrated proper authorization by two Commissioners. The appeal is reinstated for reconsideration, with the Tribunal to address the preliminary objection on tax effect. The appeal is concluded without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>