<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 651 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265376</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal was held not maintainable where the appeal had already been dismissed as time-barred beyond the condonable period of limitation. Relying on the Full Bench view, the Court stated that once the statutory period for condonation had expired and the appeal stood dismissed on that basis, writ jurisdiction could not be invoked to seek the same relief. The petition was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 651 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265376</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal was held not maintainable where the appeal had already been dismissed as time-barred beyond the condonable period of limitation. Relying on the Full Bench view, the Court stated that once the statutory period for condonation had expired and the appeal stood dismissed on that basis, writ jurisdiction could not be invoked to seek the same relief. The petition was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>