<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 645 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265370</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi granted exemption for CM Appl. 9602 &amp;amp; 9604/2014, subject to exceptions. CEAC 59 &amp;amp; 60/2014 were admitted to consider if the Tribunal misinterpreted Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Stay was provided for CM Appl. 9601 &amp;amp; 9603/2014, with the penalty deposit requirement suspended until final appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 645 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265370</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi granted exemption for CM Appl. 9602 &amp;amp; 9604/2014, subject to exceptions. CEAC 59 &amp;amp; 60/2014 were admitted to consider if the Tribunal misinterpreted Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Stay was provided for CM Appl. 9601 &amp;amp; 9603/2014, with the penalty deposit requirement suspended until final appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>