<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 640 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265365</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras set aside the order refusing to condone a 109-day delay in a civil miscellaneous appeal due to the person handling the file leaving the job. The Appellate Tribunal was directed to number the appeal if the papers are in order, and the appeal was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 640 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265365</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras set aside the order refusing to condone a 109-day delay in a civil miscellaneous appeal due to the person handling the file leaving the job. The Appellate Tribunal was directed to number the appeal if the papers are in order, and the appeal was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>