<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 441 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174568</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the petition concerning a survey conducted under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act at the petitioner&#039;s premises. The petitioner&#039;s money lending business was revealed through seized notebooks, leading to additional income disclosure and return filings. The case revolved around interest levied under Section 234A, 234B, and 234C, with the petitioner challenging the delegation of power to waive interest to CCIT/DGIT. The court held that since the power had been delegated, there was no basis to set aside the endorsement and direct the board to reconsider the waiver request, ultimately dismissing the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 441 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174568</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the petition concerning a survey conducted under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act at the petitioner&#039;s premises. The petitioner&#039;s money lending business was revealed through seized notebooks, leading to additional income disclosure and return filings. The case revolved around interest levied under Section 234A, 234B, and 234C, with the petitioner challenging the delegation of power to waive interest to CCIT/DGIT. The court held that since the power had been delegated, there was no basis to set aside the endorsement and direct the board to reconsider the waiver request, ultimately dismissing the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>