https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174559 Interim release of seized goods was considered appropriate where the goods were covered by exemption notifications, including a notification granting nil duty to bagasse board and a substituted notification relevant to the product description. The court also noted that similarly situated manufacturers in another State were being assessed at nil duty and that the grievance had been raised for some time. On that basis, interim protection was justified, but it was balanced against the department's demand by requiring a bond for the duty that may ultimately be found leviable at the asserted rate. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:24:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174559 Interim release of seized goods was considered appropriate where the goods were covered by exemption notifications, including a notification granting nil duty to bagasse board and a substituted notification relevant to the product description. The court also noted that similarly situated manufacturers in another State were being assessed at nil duty and that the grievance had been raised for some time. On that basis, interim protection was justified, but it was balanced against the department's demand by requiring a bond for the duty that may ultimately be found leviable at the asserted rate. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174559