<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 739 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174555</link>
    <description>Fatal motor accident compensation is assessed on the dependants&#039; pecuniary loss, beginning with the deceased&#039;s actual earnings and family contribution; a claim for future prospects requires cogent evidence of likely advancement, special qualifications, or proved circumstances, and is not inferred without support. Findings on contributory negligence based on evidence, such as a head-on collision, are treated as factual findings. Interest on compensation may be allowed as a reasonable discretionary component. The article also states that an insurer cannot bypass the Motor Vehicles Act&#039;s statutory appellate framework by invoking writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 to challenge an award on grounds not available under the Act, including interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 739 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174555</link>
      <description>Fatal motor accident compensation is assessed on the dependants&#039; pecuniary loss, beginning with the deceased&#039;s actual earnings and family contribution; a claim for future prospects requires cogent evidence of likely advancement, special qualifications, or proved circumstances, and is not inferred without support. Findings on contributory negligence based on evidence, such as a head-on collision, are treated as factual findings. Interest on compensation may be allowed as a reasonable discretionary component. The article also states that an insurer cannot bypass the Motor Vehicles Act&#039;s statutory appellate framework by invoking writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 to challenge an award on grounds not available under the Act, including interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>