<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 739 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174555</link>
    <description>Motor accident compensation is assessed by reference to the dependants&#039; pecuniary loss, using the deceased&#039;s actual earnings and family contribution as the starting point. Future income prospects require cogent and reliable evidence of probable advancement, qualifications or other established circumstances. Contributory negligence may be apportioned where supported by accident evidence, and interest may form a discretionary component of compensation. An insurer must pursue challenges within the statutory appellate framework and permitted defences under the Motor Vehicles Act; writ jurisdiction cannot ordinarily enlarge those grounds where no permission exists to contest the claim fully.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 739 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174555</link>
      <description>Motor accident compensation is assessed by reference to the dependants&#039; pecuniary loss, using the deceased&#039;s actual earnings and family contribution as the starting point. Future income prospects require cogent and reliable evidence of probable advancement, qualifications or other established circumstances. Contributory negligence may be apportioned where supported by accident evidence, and interest may form a discretionary component of compensation. An insurer must pursue challenges within the statutory appellate framework and permitted defences under the Motor Vehicles Act; writ jurisdiction cannot ordinarily enlarge those grounds where no permission exists to contest the claim fully.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>