https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174547 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeals and directing each party to bear their own costs. The Court found that Article 363 of the Constitution barred its jurisdiction due to an agreement between Maharaja Hari Singh and the Government of India regarding the disputed articles. Additionally, the Court determined that the appellant had waived or abandoned his rights to the articles through his actions and inactions over time. The Court also upheld the Government of India's rejection of the representation, stating that the matter involved disputed facts not suitable for writ jurisdiction and lacked exceptional grounds for interference. en-us Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174547 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeals and directing each party to bear their own costs. The Court found that Article 363 of the Constitution barred its jurisdiction due to an agreement between Maharaja Hari Singh and the Government of India regarding the disputed articles. Additionally, the Court determined that the appellant had waived or abandoned his rights to the articles through his actions and inactions over time. The Court also upheld the Government of India's rejection of the representation, stating that the matter involved disputed facts not suitable for writ jurisdiction and lacked exceptional grounds for interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174547