<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265337</link>
    <description>SC held that Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) and Concrete Mix (CM) are distinct products, rejecting assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification No. 4/1997-CE. The assessee operated fully automatic batching plants with transit mixers, using cement, aggregates, water, and chemical admixtures including retarders and plasticizers. The court found that the assessee had previously acknowledged manufacturing RMC, not CM, and that the sophisticated mixing process differentiated RMC from conventional CM. Since the notification exempts only CM and not RMC, exemption was denied. The court applied strict interpretation favoring revenue in exemption matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265337</link>
      <description>SC held that Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) and Concrete Mix (CM) are distinct products, rejecting assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification No. 4/1997-CE. The assessee operated fully automatic batching plants with transit mixers, using cement, aggregates, water, and chemical admixtures including retarders and plasticizers. The court found that the assessee had previously acknowledged manufacturing RMC, not CM, and that the sophisticated mixing process differentiated RMC from conventional CM. Since the notification exempts only CM and not RMC, exemption was denied. The court applied strict interpretation favoring revenue in exemption matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>