<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 582 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 6,00,000 as unexplained income deposited with a partnership firm. However, the addition of Rs. 1,00,000 for alleged low withdrawals was upheld. The issue regarding interest charges and withdrawals under specific sections of the Act was deemed consequential and not further addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 582 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 6,00,000 as unexplained income deposited with a partnership firm. However, the addition of Rs. 1,00,000 for alleged low withdrawals was upheld. The issue regarding interest charges and withdrawals under specific sections of the Act was deemed consequential and not further addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>