<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 579 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable as the additions were based on estimates, not concealment of income. Relying on precedents from higher courts, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, revoking it and allowing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 579 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable as the additions were based on estimates, not concealment of income. Relying on precedents from higher courts, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, revoking it and allowing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>