<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 541 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174544</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the initiation of a special audit under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision did not require reasons to be provided and that the approval of a high-ranking authority was sufficient. As there were no allegations of mala fide, the court declined to interfere with the Assessing Officer&#039;s judgment. Precedents cited were deemed not directly applicable, and the court emphasized the safeguard provided by the involvement of a high-ranking authority. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the revenue, finding no fault in the initiation of the special audit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:13:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 541 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174544</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the initiation of a special audit under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision did not require reasons to be provided and that the approval of a high-ranking authority was sufficient. As there were no allegations of mala fide, the court declined to interfere with the Assessing Officer&#039;s judgment. Precedents cited were deemed not directly applicable, and the court emphasized the safeguard provided by the involvement of a high-ranking authority. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the revenue, finding no fault in the initiation of the special audit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>