https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174540 Possession and transportation of Buprenorphine Hydrochloride were held not to attract NDPS penal liability on the facts, because the substance was shown to be outside Schedule I to the NDPS Rules and the record disclosed intra-country dealing rather than proved import or export. The Court treated the matter as falling for consideration under the Drugs and Cosmetics regime instead. On the Section 216 CrPC issue, a Special Court could entertain a fresh application and pass an order in terms of an earlier High Court direction; that was not an impermissible review of the charge order, and the challenge failed. en-us Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:33:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174540 Possession and transportation of Buprenorphine Hydrochloride were held not to attract NDPS penal liability on the facts, because the substance was shown to be outside Schedule I to the NDPS Rules and the record disclosed intra-country dealing rather than proved import or export. The Court treated the matter as falling for consideration under the Drugs and Cosmetics regime instead. On the Section 216 CrPC issue, a Special Court could entertain a fresh application and pass an order in terms of an earlier High Court direction; that was not an impermissible review of the charge order, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174540