https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174535 Where a statute confers substantive power to dispose of compensation pool property, that power remains exercisable even if rules have not yet been framed, unless rule-making is made a condition precedent; auction sale of the urban agricultural land was therefore not invalid on that ground. A residuary power under section 33 could also be used to extend the time for deposit of the balance purchase price, since enlarging time to meet subsequent circumstances was not a review of the earlier order. Relief under section 33, however, could not be granted without notice and hearing to subsequent auction purchasers who were directly affected, because natural justice required an opportunity of hearing before their interests were prejudiced. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 16:29:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174535 Where a statute confers substantive power to dispose of compensation pool property, that power remains exercisable even if rules have not yet been framed, unless rule-making is made a condition precedent; auction sale of the urban agricultural land was therefore not invalid on that ground. A residuary power under section 33 could also be used to extend the time for deposit of the balance purchase price, since enlarging time to meet subsequent circumstances was not a review of the earlier order. Relief under section 33, however, could not be granted without notice and hearing to subsequent auction purchasers who were directly affected, because natural justice required an opportunity of hearing before their interests were prejudiced. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174535