<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 607 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174527</link>
    <description>Freight or truck hire incurred to bring coal from outside Uttar Pradesh was held includible in turnover where it was the seller&#039;s legal burden under the U.P. Coal Control Order, 1977 and formed part of the cost of supply, even if paid directly by the buyer to the transporter. The definition of turnover did not exclude such freight on these facts. On assessment, rejection of the books justified best judgment estimation, but arbitrary quantity assumptions and unsupported profit additions were modified. For one dealer, the 15-tonnes-per-truck estimate was found arbitrary and the disclosed quantity accepted; for other years, excessive turnover estimates were reduced on the available material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:00:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 607 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174527</link>
      <description>Freight or truck hire incurred to bring coal from outside Uttar Pradesh was held includible in turnover where it was the seller&#039;s legal burden under the U.P. Coal Control Order, 1977 and formed part of the cost of supply, even if paid directly by the buyer to the transporter. The definition of turnover did not exclude such freight on these facts. On assessment, rejection of the books justified best judgment estimation, but arbitrary quantity assumptions and unsupported profit additions were modified. For one dealer, the 15-tonnes-per-truck estimate was found arbitrary and the disclosed quantity accepted; for other years, excessive turnover estimates were reduced on the available material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>