https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174525 The Supreme Court interpreted section 18(1) of the West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 as confined to a true decree for recovery of possession, not an order for possession made in summary proceedings under Chapter VII of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. It relied on the statutory distinction between a decree and an order, noting that the 1948 and 1950 rent control schemes treated those remedies separately and that a marginal note could not enlarge clear text. The Court also held that any apparent hardship or omission could not justify judicial rewriting of the provision, so relief under section 18(1) was unavailable. en-us Thu, 29 Jan 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:41:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174525 The Supreme Court interpreted section 18(1) of the West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 as confined to a true decree for recovery of possession, not an order for possession made in summary proceedings under Chapter VII of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. It relied on the statutory distinction between a decree and an order, noting that the 1948 and 1950 rent control schemes treated those remedies separately and that a marginal note could not enlarge clear text. The Court also held that any apparent hardship or omission could not justify judicial rewriting of the provision, so relief under section 18(1) was unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Jan 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174525