<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 640 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174523</link>
    <description>Compensation for fruit-bearing trees surrendered under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms ceiling law is to be computed according to the plain terms of the statute, rules, and notified seignorage rates. Where the notification states that the rate is per tree per year and assumes a 30-year yield period, compensation must cover the remaining productive life of the trees, not merely one year. The governing principle is that clear statutory language cannot be rewritten by interpretation, and no words may be added to or subtracted from an unambiguous provision. On that basis, trees already 12 years old attracted compensation for the balance 18 years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 640 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174523</link>
      <description>Compensation for fruit-bearing trees surrendered under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms ceiling law is to be computed according to the plain terms of the statute, rules, and notified seignorage rates. Where the notification states that the rate is per tree per year and assumes a 30-year yield period, compensation must cover the remaining productive life of the trees, not merely one year. The governing principle is that clear statutory language cannot be rewritten by interpretation, and no words may be added to or subtracted from an unambiguous provision. On that basis, trees already 12 years old attracted compensation for the balance 18 years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>