https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174519 The Tribunal found that the impugned order did not violate natural justice principles as the applicants failed to take advantage of opportunities for cross-examination and personal hearings. Disputes regarding receipt of inputs, wrongful credit availed, and payment discrepancies were addressed. Despite financial hardship claims, the Tribunal directed the applicants to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, with the remaining amount waived during the appeal's pendency, subject to compliance reporting. en-us Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2018 19:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174519 The Tribunal found that the impugned order did not violate natural justice principles as the applicants failed to take advantage of opportunities for cross-examination and personal hearings. Disputes regarding receipt of inputs, wrongful credit availed, and payment discrepancies were addressed. Despite financial hardship claims, the Tribunal directed the applicants to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, with the remaining amount waived during the appeal's pendency, subject to compliance reporting. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174519