<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 16 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=627</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, upheld the classification of &quot;Cork Tipping Base Paper&quot; under Chapter Heading 48.13 (CTH 4813.90) instead of CTH 4805.29. The decision was based on the &quot;Motley Process&quot; involving ink coating to enhance paper resistance during smoking, aligning with cigarette paper characteristics. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling affirmed the authorities&#039; classification and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the paper&#039;s specific qualities and intended use in cigarette manufacturing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 16 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=627</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, upheld the classification of &quot;Cork Tipping Base Paper&quot; under Chapter Heading 48.13 (CTH 4813.90) instead of CTH 4805.29. The decision was based on the &quot;Motley Process&quot; involving ink coating to enhance paper resistance during smoking, aligning with cigarette paper characteristics. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling affirmed the authorities&#039; classification and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the paper&#039;s specific qualities and intended use in cigarette manufacturing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>