https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174492 A writ challenge to admission in an agricultural college failed because the petitioners had no locus standi to question seats created for categories to which they did not belong. The Supreme Court also found that the course was already substantially advanced, with the admitted student having attended classes and passed examinations, so reversing the admission would cause serious prejudice and leave any substitute candidate to restart the course. On those facts, the writ remedy was held to be ineffective and unjust, the High Court's order could not stand, and the challenge was dismissed. en-us Mon, 01 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:45:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174492 A writ challenge to admission in an agricultural college failed because the petitioners had no locus standi to question seats created for categories to which they did not belong. The Supreme Court also found that the course was already substantially advanced, with the admitted student having attended classes and passed examinations, so reversing the admission would cause serious prejudice and leave any substitute candidate to restart the course. On those facts, the writ remedy was held to be ineffective and unjust, the High Court's order could not stand, and the challenge was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174492