<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 922 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174483</link>
    <description>The Division Bench of the Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in the challenge against a Notification imposing restrictions on customs duty for goods imported from Sri Lanka. The Court held that the notification did not serve the intended purpose of preventing misuse of concessions and was not issued in public interest as it opposed the law and treaty provisions. The Court made the Rule absolute in favor of the petitioner based on the reasoning of the Bombay High Court and did not award any costs in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 922 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174483</link>
      <description>The Division Bench of the Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in the challenge against a Notification imposing restrictions on customs duty for goods imported from Sri Lanka. The Court held that the notification did not serve the intended purpose of preventing misuse of concessions and was not issued in public interest as it opposed the law and treaty provisions. The Court made the Rule absolute in favor of the petitioner based on the reasoning of the Bombay High Court and did not award any costs in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>