<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 570 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the change of cause title in the petition and disposed of the matter accordingly. Regarding the appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order on interest for belated payment of differential duty, the Tribunal upheld the demand for interest, citing relevant Supreme Court judgments. The appellants were held liable to pay the interest as per the impugned order, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 07:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 570 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the change of cause title in the petition and disposed of the matter accordingly. Regarding the appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order on interest for belated payment of differential duty, the Tribunal upheld the demand for interest, citing relevant Supreme Court judgments. The appellants were held liable to pay the interest as per the impugned order, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>