<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 555 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265280</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the special leave petition, removing the procedural bar to consideration. The Court, however, found no reason to entertain the petition and dismissed it. It also granted limited procedural relief by extending the time for deposit of the amount by two months from the date of the order. Delay was thus excused, but the substantive challenge was not admitted, subject only to the extended deposit period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 07:42:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 555 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265280</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the special leave petition, removing the procedural bar to consideration. The Court, however, found no reason to entertain the petition and dismissed it. It also granted limited procedural relief by extending the time for deposit of the amount by two months from the date of the order. Delay was thus excused, but the substantive challenge was not admitted, subject only to the extended deposit period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>