<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 550 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265275</link>
    <description>The SC found no error apparent on the face of the record in the earlier civil appeal order and declined to reopen it. The review petition was dismissed after the Court examined the petition and the appeal record, indicating that the challenged order did not warrant reconsideration. The text records only the rejection of review and does not state any broader substantive ruling on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 07:42:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 550 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265275</link>
      <description>The SC found no error apparent on the face of the record in the earlier civil appeal order and declined to reopen it. The review petition was dismissed after the Court examined the petition and the appeal record, indicating that the challenged order did not warrant reconsideration. The text records only the rejection of review and does not state any broader substantive ruling on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>