<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 545 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the amendment of the invoice value under section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962. The case involved an EOU importing machineries with a disputed value declaration. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration or intention to evade duty based on the procurement certificate and payment terms, deeming the demand for differential duty unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 07:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 545 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the amendment of the invoice value under section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962. The case involved an EOU importing machineries with a disputed value declaration. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration or intention to evade duty based on the procurement certificate and payment terms, deeming the demand for differential duty unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>