<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment under section 147/148 as the notice was issued beyond the statutory period without required sanction, rendering it invalid. The Commissioner&#039;s approval instead of the Joint Commissioner for reopening the assessment lacked proper jurisdiction, leading to the reassessment&#039;s annulment. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, allowing consideration on merits. Additional grounds challenging the reassessment&#039;s conclusion were admitted but became irrelevant following the reassessment&#039;s quashing. The Tribunal&#039;s decision ensured justice by upholding legal principles and statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 07:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment under section 147/148 as the notice was issued beyond the statutory period without required sanction, rendering it invalid. The Commissioner&#039;s approval instead of the Joint Commissioner for reopening the assessment lacked proper jurisdiction, leading to the reassessment&#039;s annulment. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, allowing consideration on merits. Additional grounds challenging the reassessment&#039;s conclusion were admitted but became irrelevant following the reassessment&#039;s quashing. The Tribunal&#039;s decision ensured justice by upholding legal principles and statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>