<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265249</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete a portion of the addition made under section 41(1)(a) and confirmed the balance, citing valid reasons related to payment confirmations and the assessee&#039;s health issues. Additionally, the ITAT found no fault in the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A, as the AO had not provided adequate opportunities to the assessee, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 07:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265249</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete a portion of the addition made under section 41(1)(a) and confirmed the balance, citing valid reasons related to payment confirmations and the assessee&#039;s health issues. Additionally, the ITAT found no fault in the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A, as the AO had not provided adequate opportunities to the assessee, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>