<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 44 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to grant Modvat credit to the respondent for service tax paid on input services. The judgment emphasized interpreting the Service Tax Credit Rules in line with the government&#039;s intention to facilitate credit for essential input services necessary for providing output services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 44 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to grant Modvat credit to the respondent for service tax paid on input services. The judgment emphasized interpreting the Service Tax Credit Rules in line with the government&#039;s intention to facilitate credit for essential input services necessary for providing output services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>