<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 25 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=615</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant, a service provider, failed to pay service tax on collected payments, admitted to non-disclosure, delayed tax payment, and did not address discrepancies promptly. The court upheld the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation. The judgment was pronounced on 26-4-2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 25 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=615</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant, a service provider, failed to pay service tax on collected payments, admitted to non-disclosure, delayed tax payment, and did not address discrepancies promptly. The court upheld the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation. The judgment was pronounced on 26-4-2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>