https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174476 The evidence established that the deceased was taken into police custody and died there, with postmortem and surrounding circumstances supporting the inference that fatal injuries were inflicted while he remained in custody. The explanation of escape from custody or a train accident was not credibly supported, so the State was responsible for the custodial death. For violation of the right to life, a constitutional court may award monetary compensation under Article 32 as a public law remedy when it is the only practicable redress, and sovereign immunity is not available as a defence. Compensation was therefore payable as constitutional redress. en-us Wed, 24 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:46:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174476 The evidence established that the deceased was taken into police custody and died there, with postmortem and surrounding circumstances supporting the inference that fatal injuries were inflicted while he remained in custody. The explanation of escape from custody or a train accident was not credibly supported, so the State was responsible for the custodial death. For violation of the right to life, a constitutional court may award monetary compensation under Article 32 as a public law remedy when it is the only practicable redress, and sovereign immunity is not available as a defence. Compensation was therefore payable as constitutional redress. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174476