https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174472 Applications framed as clarification, modification or recall cannot be used to bypass the Supreme Court review procedure or secure a second review after dismissal of review petitions; substance prevails over form, and a further review is not maintainable. In land acquisition matters, the operative High Court order alone controls the scope of earlier writ relief, later reasoning cannot enlarge it, and challenge to the declaration fails where personal objections were not raised before acquisition. The Court also noted that a declaration need not set out elaborate reasons for each parcel. On a conceded representation by the DDA, only limited relief was available: consideration of de-notification, with status quo maintained meanwhile. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:19:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174472 Applications framed as clarification, modification or recall cannot be used to bypass the Supreme Court review procedure or secure a second review after dismissal of review petitions; substance prevails over form, and a further review is not maintainable. In land acquisition matters, the operative High Court order alone controls the scope of earlier writ relief, later reasoning cannot enlarge it, and challenge to the declaration fails where personal objections were not raised before acquisition. The Court also noted that a declaration need not set out elaborate reasons for each parcel. On a conceded representation by the DDA, only limited relief was available: consideration of de-notification, with status quo maintained meanwhile. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174472