<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 724 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174469</link>
    <description>Leasing of storage tanks to customers who did not own them was disputed as potentially falling within banking and financial services for service tax purposes. Relying on an earlier stay order in the assessee&#039;s own case for a prior period, the CESTAT waived pre-deposit of the service tax demand and penalties and stayed recovery during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 724 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174469</link>
      <description>Leasing of storage tanks to customers who did not own them was disputed as potentially falling within banking and financial services for service tax purposes. Relying on an earlier stay order in the assessee&#039;s own case for a prior period, the CESTAT waived pre-deposit of the service tax demand and penalties and stayed recovery during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>