https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174461 The Supreme Court criticized the Tribunal's approach in a case involving allegations of mala fides against the Selection Committee. The Court emphasized the need for concrete evidence to prove mala fides and highlighted the presumption of administrative actions being in good faith. The Tribunal's decision to quash the viva voce test result and order a fresh test was faulted by the Court, which stressed the importance of focusing on compliance with rules rather than assuming bias. The Court also cautioned against drawing conclusions based on indirect associations and underscored the significance of following established procedures in selection processes. Ultimately, the Court set aside the Tribunal's order and dismissed the original application, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to due process. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:14:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174461 The Supreme Court criticized the Tribunal's approach in a case involving allegations of mala fides against the Selection Committee. The Court emphasized the need for concrete evidence to prove mala fides and highlighted the presumption of administrative actions being in good faith. The Tribunal's decision to quash the viva voce test result and order a fresh test was faulted by the Court, which stressed the importance of focusing on compliance with rules rather than assuming bias. The Court also cautioned against drawing conclusions based on indirect associations and underscored the significance of following established procedures in selection processes. Ultimately, the Court set aside the Tribunal's order and dismissed the original application, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to due process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174461