https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174455 The Court clarified that the demand for U.P. VAT by Reliance Industries Ltd. was based on their agreement terms, not previous court orders. Customers were affirmed the right to dispute such demands. The Court assured that its observations would not affect the High Court proceedings. Consequently, the Court disposed of NTPC Ltd.'s I.A. No.6 of 2012, addressing concerns over CST and U.P. VAT payment. Additionally, M/s. TATA Chemicals Limited's I.A. No.7 of 2012 was also disposed of in light of the clarifications provided, concluding the matter for TATA Chemicals Limited. en-us Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174455 The Court clarified that the demand for U.P. VAT by Reliance Industries Ltd. was based on their agreement terms, not previous court orders. Customers were affirmed the right to dispute such demands. The Court assured that its observations would not affect the High Court proceedings. Consequently, the Court disposed of NTPC Ltd.'s I.A. No.6 of 2012, addressing concerns over CST and U.P. VAT payment. Additionally, M/s. TATA Chemicals Limited's I.A. No.7 of 2012 was also disposed of in light of the clarifications provided, concluding the matter for TATA Chemicals Limited. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174455