https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174454 The respondent No.1 agreed to pay the Value Added Tax imposed by the State of U.P., leading to the proposal to refer the matter back to the High Court for determining the payment. The State of U.P. and the Union of India supported this, emphasizing the need for the High Court to decide on the liability for Value Added Tax on goods transported through the State. The High Court was directed to consider the burden of the tax on customers, address arrear dues, and dispose of the case promptly within three months for efficient resolution. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174454 The respondent No.1 agreed to pay the Value Added Tax imposed by the State of U.P., leading to the proposal to refer the matter back to the High Court for determining the payment. The State of U.P. and the Union of India supported this, emphasizing the need for the High Court to decide on the liability for Value Added Tax on goods transported through the State. The High Court was directed to consider the burden of the tax on customers, address arrear dues, and dispose of the case promptly within three months for efficient resolution. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174454