<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (10) TMI 8 - IN THE KING`S BENCH DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174453</link>
    <description>The legal expenses incurred by the Respondent Company in defending an action disputing its title to property in the United States were held to be deductible for income-tax purposes. The court found that the expenses were wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of the Company&#039;s trade and were classified as revenue expenditure rather than capital. The decision of the Commissioners allowing the deduction was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (10) TMI 8 - IN THE KING`S BENCH DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174453</link>
      <description>The legal expenses incurred by the Respondent Company in defending an action disputing its title to property in the United States were held to be deductible for income-tax purposes. The court found that the expenses were wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of the Company&#039;s trade and were classified as revenue expenditure rather than capital. The decision of the Commissioners allowing the deduction was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>