https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174448 The omission of Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the 1994 amendment removed the earlier twelve-month limitation bar for accident compensation claims. That deletion was held to apply to pending matters where the limitation objection had not attained finality, reflecting the legislative intent to avoid rejection of claims on technical limitation grounds. The claim petition therefore could not be dismissed as time-barred, the High Court's order was set aside, and the Tribunal was directed to entertain and decide the claim on merits. en-us Tue, 07 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:17:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174448 The omission of Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the 1994 amendment removed the earlier twelve-month limitation bar for accident compensation claims. That deletion was held to apply to pending matters where the limitation objection had not attained finality, reflecting the legislative intent to avoid rejection of claims on technical limitation grounds. The claim petition therefore could not be dismissed as time-barred, the High Court's order was set aside, and the Tribunal was directed to entertain and decide the claim on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174448