https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174443 Additional evidence in appeal is admissible only when the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment, not to fill gaps left at trial; on the stated facts, the evidence was rightly disregarded because no necessity was shown and its genuineness was doubtful. Once that material was excluded, there was no satisfactory proof that the property descended from a common ancestor by inheritance, so it was not established as ancestral. As a result, a customary challenge to the alienation of non-ancestral immovable property was barred by section 7 of Punjab Act II of 1920, and the challenge failed. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 13:18:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174443 Additional evidence in appeal is admissible only when the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment, not to fill gaps left at trial; on the stated facts, the evidence was rightly disregarded because no necessity was shown and its genuineness was doubtful. Once that material was excluded, there was no satisfactory proof that the property descended from a common ancestor by inheritance, so it was not established as ancestral. As a result, a customary challenge to the alienation of non-ancestral immovable property was barred by section 7 of Punjab Act II of 1920, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174443