<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174434</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deductibility of provisions for warranty made for the assessment years 1986-87 and 1987-88 under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the provisions for warranty were allowable deductions and could be classified as business expenditure. The decision was based on a previous judgment that favored the assessee, and no costs were imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174434</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deductibility of provisions for warranty made for the assessment years 1986-87 and 1987-88 under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the provisions for warranty were allowable deductions and could be classified as business expenditure. The decision was based on a previous judgment that favored the assessee, and no costs were imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>