https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174429 Denial of a landlord-tenant relationship does not by itself oust the jurisdiction of Rent Control authorities under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; the Controller may incidentally determine that relationship to proceed under the statute, and Section 15 orders for rent deposit and default consequences remain operative on that footing. The unchallenged appellate order striking out the defence had attained finality because no second appeal was taken, so the same controversy could not be reopened by challenging jurisdiction in the later appeal. The challenge therefore failed, and the eviction order was left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:23:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174429 Denial of a landlord-tenant relationship does not by itself oust the jurisdiction of Rent Control authorities under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; the Controller may incidentally determine that relationship to proceed under the statute, and Section 15 orders for rent deposit and default consequences remain operative on that footing. The unchallenged appellate order striking out the defence had attained finality because no second appeal was taken, so the same controversy could not be reopened by challenging jurisdiction in the later appeal. The challenge therefore failed, and the eviction order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174429