https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174421 The Supreme Court found that the Tribunal failed to provide sufficient reasons for its decisions on basic wages and dearness allowance. The comparison between Woolcombers and jute mills lacked supporting evidence, and no alternative comparable concerns were assessed. The Tribunal was instructed to reassess basic wages and dearness allowance using the region part of the industry-cum-region formula and following the guidelines outlined in the judgment. The Tribunal was given four months to submit its revised findings to the Supreme Court, with costs to be determined accordingly. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:50:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174421 The Supreme Court found that the Tribunal failed to provide sufficient reasons for its decisions on basic wages and dearness allowance. The comparison between Woolcombers and jute mills lacked supporting evidence, and no alternative comparable concerns were assessed. The Tribunal was instructed to reassess basic wages and dearness allowance using the region part of the industry-cum-region formula and following the guidelines outlined in the judgment. The Tribunal was given four months to submit its revised findings to the Supreme Court, with costs to be determined accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174421