https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174420 The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the special leave petition in order to challenge the underlying High Court orders separately. The Supreme Court therefore dismissed the SLP as not pressed and made no observation on the merits of the orders dated 25-9-2008 and 15-4-2010. It further clarified that any future challenge to those orders would be considered on its own merits. en-us Mon, 02 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174420 The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the special leave petition in order to challenge the underlying High Court orders separately. The Supreme Court therefore dismissed the SLP as not pressed and made no observation on the merits of the orders dated 25-9-2008 and 15-4-2010. It further clarified that any future challenge to those orders would be considered on its own merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174420