<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 597 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174419</link>
    <description>Wrongly availed CENVAT credit taken before opting for exemption was held adjustable against the closing balance in the credit account on the relevant date, because the available balance exceeded the disputed amount. On that footing, no separate recovery of the credit survived, and the basis for penalty also failed. The demand, interest and penalty were therefore set aside, recognising that where the disputed credit is covered by the closing balance at the time of opting for exemption, it need not be paid back separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 597 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174419</link>
      <description>Wrongly availed CENVAT credit taken before opting for exemption was held adjustable against the closing balance in the credit account on the relevant date, because the available balance exceeded the disputed amount. On that footing, no separate recovery of the credit survived, and the basis for penalty also failed. The demand, interest and penalty were therefore set aside, recognising that where the disputed credit is covered by the closing balance at the time of opting for exemption, it need not be paid back separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>