<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 494 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174417</link>
    <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, while the petitioner was left free, if permissible in law, to file a reference application along with an application for condonation of delay. The concerned court was directed to decide the condonation request in accordance with law, and the order was expressly stated not to express any view on condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 494 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174417</link>
      <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, while the petitioner was left free, if permissible in law, to file a reference application along with an application for condonation of delay. The concerned court was directed to decide the condonation request in accordance with law, and the order was expressly stated not to express any view on condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>